Senators Push Aid for
Active Farmers
By Philip Brasher
AP Farm Writer
Sept. 26, 2001
WASHINGTON –– Leaders of the Senate Agriculture
Committee want to provide government subsidies to people who are actively
farming, rather than absentee landowners and corporations.
Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the committee's Democratic chairman, and Indiana Sen.
Richard Lugar, its senior Republican, on Tuesday issued a list of broad
principles that they want farm programs to follow.
They said government payments should provide reasonable protection for
producers who are "actively involved in farming and ranching."
Although there are limits on what individual recipients can get, anyone with
a financial stake in farmland and the crops it produces can qualify for
subsidies.
The committee is expected to begin work this fall on a revision of farm
programs that are scheduled to expire a year from now. Harkin said the Senate
bill should be a "a significant change from past policies."
Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman was scheduled to testify before the
committee on Wednesday.
She issued a 120-page report last week that criticized crop subsidies and
proposed putting more money into conservation programs. Price supports are
stimulating excess production and inflating land rents, making it harder for
U.S. farmers to compete with lower-cost growers in other countries, the report
said.
Harkin and Lugar are expected to push for more spending on conservation
programs than other committee members.
They did not recommend spending levels for any programs, but they said
conservation spending should be balanced between land-retirement programs and
rewards to farmers for improved environmental practices on land still in
production, the senators said.
The House Agriculture Committee this summer approved legislation that would
spend nearly $170 billion in food and agriculture programs over the next
decade.
The bill expands assistance to grain and cotton farmers, who have
traditionally received the lion's share of federal aid. Economists say that
spending under the bill could exceed the annual subsidy limits the United
States committed to in the World Trade Organization. The limits apply to
subsidies that encourage crop production.
The list of principles "is still a long ways from a Senate bill,"
said Mary Kay Thatcher, a lobbyist for the American Farm Bureau Federation.
"These seem like goals that really are motherhood and apple pie that
anybody could be supportive of."
Andy Fisher, a spokesman for Lugar, said the list's content was not as
important as it was that Lugar and Harkin "have spelled out that they want
to work in a bipartisan way to draft a farm bill along these lines."