Funding for Farms Uncertain

By Philip Brasher
AP Farm Writer
Sept. 26, 2001

WASHINGTON –– Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman said Wednesday that funding for future farm programs is uncertain in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

"I can't tell you where the budget is going to go with regard to anything," Veneman told the Senate Agriculture Committee.

This spring's congressional agreement set aside nearly $170 billion for Congress to spend on farm programs over the next 10 years, but nearly $74 billion was to have come from projected budget surpluses that now appear unlikely to materialize. The House is expected to vote next week on a farm bill that would depend on all of that money being available.

Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, the committee's senior Republican, said the House bill would require using money needed for Social Security, Medicare and education. He pressed Veneman to take a position on the legislation before the House votes. "The department needs to speak up," Lugar said.

On Tuesday, Lugar and Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the committee's Democratic chairman, issued a list of broad principles that they want farm programs to follow.

They said government payments should provide reasonable protection for producers who are "actively involved in farming and ranching," as opposed to absentee landowners and corporations.

Although there are limits on what individual recipients can get, anyone with a financial stake in farmland and the crops it produces can qualify for subsidies.

The committee is expected to begin work this fall on a revision of farm programs that are scheduled to expire a year from now. Harkin said the Senate bill should be a "a significant change from past policies."

She issued a 120-page report last week that criticized crop subsidies and proposed putting more money into conservation programs. Price supports are stimulating excess production and inflating land rents, making it harder for U.S. farmers to compete with lower-cost growers in other countries, the report said.

Harkin and Lugar are expected to push for more spending on conservation programs than other committee members.

They did not recommend spending levels for any programs, but they said conservation spending should be balanced between land-retirement programs and rewards to farmers for improved environmental practices on land still in production, the senators said.

The House Agriculture Committee this summer approved legislation that would spend nearly $170 billion in food and agriculture programs over the next decade.

The bill expands assistance to grain and cotton farmers, who have traditionally received the lion's share of federal aid. Economists say that spending under the bill could exceed the annual subsidy limits the United States committed to in the World Trade Organization. The limits apply to subsidies that encourage crop production.

The list of principles "is still a long ways from a Senate bill," said Mary Kay Thatcher, a lobbyist for the American Farm Bureau Federation. "These seem like goals that really are motherhood and apple pie that anybody could be supportive of."

Andy Fisher, a spokesman for Lugar, said the list's content was not as important as it was that Lugar and Harkin "have spelled out that they want to work in a bipartisan way to draft a farm bill along these lines."